DCC produced curious and very sub-optimal expert reports at great tax-payer expense, including one curious report on property values, allegedly based on research. The data for this is as visible as presidential election results in Zimbabwe. Like Mugabe's re-election team, DCC had the brass-neck to say other reports lack statistical rigour.
Such a curious, selective and non-quantitative report on property tends to undermine public confidence in DCC and in the more challenging scientific opinions presented by DCC at a cost of €18 million of taxpayer funds.
It was no surprise to observe at least one of DCC's reports being shown to be a fiasco at the Bord Pleanala Oral Hearing.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKqZll8j6oAgm8qER9xezuhFZEsgAuuJpfqS8-vDP3T2RVRE5p_wLQcZWXoufJ7lGqbKAKS07tW-HdPijjV4dtwhTm_scmP5O8bKhniW8dOwQLkaEa0ZAgVywpMRJL2S5htW7u3P_1Cu8/s400/dilbertLying2.gif)
-------------
Footnote:
Where is the data?
- Curiously, the fundamental data used to produce the eye-candy charts and the commentary for the DCC Property Values report seems to have been omitted from DCC’s psuedo-website.
- Does the data exist?
- Why keep it from the public who have already paid for it?
No comments:
Post a Comment