Because We Are Worth It.
Toni
The autocracy says it got involved at the €450 million IGB site because members of the local community had urged it to.
- Example of DDDA Bare-Faced 'Spin'. Published Whilst 2008 Accounts Are Being Cooked to Hide Write-off of €450 Million.
‘You have to make a choice. Did you not know what was going on? If you didn’t, you must ask yourself, are you a competent director? And if you did know, you were complicit in recklessness and fraud. So which is it? Because there isn’t anything in between’.
Will Mr Brian Lenihan use NAMA to keep this apparently unprecedented misuse of taxpayer money secret and outside the Feedom of Information Act?
NAMA Site Ringsend
- What evidence does NAMA have that the current market price of property, land etc is not in fact the correct price to pay?
- What evidence does NAMA have that the current market price of these is not in fact going to decline for a number of years, as would be the case if Ireland were to follow the common experience of previous property crashes?
- Why would a temporary nationalisation of the banks be a bad thing, given that this would provide the taxpayer with a valuable asset which could be sold in future years?
- Why does no independent analyst support the governments view on NAMA? This includes the Swedish finance minister who ran their bad bank system, who said to the Irish Times that he “favours the more severe mark-to-market write-down of assets rather than a ‘through the cycle’ valuation.”, and that “it (NAMA) does not sound like the right solution to buy assets from private banks.” It also includes the IMF who said " Insolvent institutions (with insufficient cash flows) should be closed, merged, or temporarily placed in public ownership until private sector solutions can be developed ... there have been numerous instances (for example, Japan, Sweden and the United States),
- where a period of public ownership has been used to cleanse balance sheets and pave the way to sales back to the private sector", in the context of saying that the likely losses for Irish banks were such as to render them insolvent.
- Why not force the equity and bond holders in Irish banks to take the first place in the queue to absorb the losses that the banks would have to book were current market prices to be paid for the loans made. After all, that’s what risk capital is for?
- If the state overpays for the loans relative to current market prices, what, apart from a functioning banking system, does the taxpayer gain?
- What percentage of book value of the loans should NAMA pay, given that current market prices for land and development properties are somewhere around 30% or less of book value?
- If NAMA were to pay say €60b for loans that are worth only €30b, how can this transfer of a full years tax revenue to private speculators be justified in this economic time?
- If, as is entirely possible, the loans transferred to NAMA do not provide sufficient income to meet the coupon payments of the bonds issues by NAMA, will the taxpayer, at least in the short term, not have to meet these payments?

Is DDDA Cooking The 2008 Books?
How much longer can Mr John Gormley "sit by and watch the taxpayer stuffed for millions of euro"?
February 2009: DDDA promised the Oireachtas Committee on Environment it would publish the 2008 annual accounts by the end of June “at the latest”.
August 2009: DDDA now says the 2008 Accounts "won’t be published until the autumn” of 2009. NAMA and the Lisbon treaty will be done by then.
Is DDDA Cooking The 2008 Books?
Truthful governance requires DDDA's 2008 Annual Account to be the financial snapshot for December 31, 2008. That is last December in 2008, not next December in 2009. Placing future values for some random date in Autumn 2009 into accounts for 2008 is bad governance, misleads readers of the report and echoes Seanie's deals with Irish Life - 'parking' seven billion Euro into Anglo for one day in order to (allegedly) cook Anglo's books. The Fraud Squad is allegedly looking into that.
The famed dogs in the street know the polluted Glass Bottle (IGB) site had zero or negative market value on December 31, 2008. This is a write down of perhaps €450 Million from the consortiums last stated price. Zero, or less, is the price for DDDA's 2008 Annual Account for IGB.
For the 2009 annual accounts the true and fair financial snapshot is for December 31, 2009. By then NAMA will have rigged the market behind closed doors and possibly bought the polluted Glass Bottle site with taxpayer money. DDDA's annual report for 2009 can then state the 2009 price for the Glass Bottle asset.
It seems DDDA is waiting for the highly secretive NAMA to be set up before it massages its 2008 accounts. Then DDDA could award itself planning permission for the DDDA 'investment', re-massage the accounts (truthfully of course, as per opaque accounting 'rules') and tap the taxpayers through NAMA. The facts can all be legally buried in the legalised NAMA dung-heap.
Tesco, Cisco and Wallmart run accounts for hundreds of millions of transactions on a daily basis, in real time. Meanwhile DDDA can not or will not produce a statement for the state of play for just one day, the last day of 2008. And this is with a 'corporate governance specialist' heading the board.
__________________
Non-publication of the 2008 accounts stalls updating on the following (gavinsblog.com; Phoenix, October 2008):
Dunne/Liam Carroll debacle
Treasury Holdings Litigation
U2 Tower
Unpaid Expert Opinion
Former EPA expert Malcolm Doak warned that 30 per cent methane gas levels exist on the lands and that “a significant gas risk still remains on-site”.
Unpaid Expert Opinion
Prof Staines, a medical doctor and academic, said it was "at best careless, and more realistically reckless, to proceed with a major development without considering methods of minimising harm and maximising benefits to the local community" and said the execution of a Health Impact Statement on such projects was common practice internationally.
In relation to the environmental impact statement, undertaken by Arup Consulting Engineers on behalf of the council, Prof Staines claimed that "in no case is there any serious consideration of the actual impacts of the estimated emissions on people in the local community or on human health".
___________

[2009] The Anglo-Irish Bank director is a beetle, which from the moment in the summer time when it began to use its wings and fly about, went about Poolbeg, not attracted by any flower in the field or any flower in the garden, no matter how beautiful they were, whether they were roses or lilies. Anglo-Irish Bank directors went about looking for some cow ddda or horse ddda in which they might roll themselves.
- Adapted from EAMON de Valera

